I thought they were investing the two who had video of it also, not really Winston but could be wrong. The other two are more likely to get in trouble for video recording some of the act without her agreeing to it.
I thought I heard that, could be wrong. I thought they said on how the university handle it and the two othe players who video recorded part of the act
Last Edit: Apr 4, 2014 9:15:09 GMT -5 by victor2111
Whatever the angle to the investigation is, the University pushed it aside so he could play in the game. Rape is a serious allegation, as are the other charges.
JTR - I know, man. The Level of corruption in mainline sports is sickening. I really am almost ready to give it up completely.
To think they would handle a rape like this just to continue with their NC run is awful. Even if he is innocent, they didn't do their due diligence during the process.
Post by mikeytbuckeyes on Apr 4, 2014 21:48:11 GMT -5
I agree with your last sentence Nerk. The university didn't do anyone any favors but themselves. The DA is just as guilty as he turned the press conference into his own personal comedy hour. Because of how it was handled, Winston will always be viewed as a rapist by some (regardless if he is or not), his Heisman will be tarnished (whether it should be or not), and FSU will always be viewed as sympathetic to athletic rapists who can make them money.
